Poetry of Peace - Kiera

When discussing peace and anti-war poetry, I find that the themes, focus, and goals of these types of poetry are very different. What the authors are trying to portray in each of these poems varies because they both do not relate to war. Peace poetry does not necessary deal or express emotions about war and battle because there are many aspects relating to serenity and non-violence. Peace exists in other aspects of life besides conflicts between countries or people; it is a total separate type of idea that does not always have to be categorized with war. Many audiences often correlate peace with war because leaders strive for no confrontation or conflict, then citizens follow their lead, they forget that peace can be settled in their states, communities and even homes. The end result is what peace poetry focuses on in context. Authors create stories or describe acts depicting advancement, so that the resolution shows effectiveness. Poems about peace advocate something more in depth than resolving conflict between two hostile groups; ideas are established through feelings of hopefulness and imagination.

On the other hand, anti-war poetry content is still about ceasing worldwide confrontation. The resistance between people is addressed in anti-war poems because authors want the audience to react in specific ways. When the author writes his or her poem in a violent tone, they can expect that the reader will get worked up and then possibly act in an aggressive manner. The readers think they are getting involved for the benefit of their country or community, yet their actions could still be somewhat forceful. In “Poems for Peace,” Philip Metres talks about how specifically the United States has come to “unwittingly [glorify] and [perpetuate] a culture of war.” The other side of poetry, peace poetry, should be revealed because it expresses other ways of “dealing with conflict, oppression, and injustice and how it may advance our thinking into what a future without war might look like” (Metres). Fighting is what anti-war poetry is against, however it is not always written in a peaceful tone; peace is something much more fragile and it written with harmony not discord.

As a part of a community, our class, it is pretty evident that peace is more conclusive to a group of people. In order for us to enter into a discourse community, we set ourselves up to ‘argue’ amongst one another because we all have different viewpoints. Except we are not arguing to prove one another wrong, we share our perspectives to build off of one another’s ideas. We talk about our disagreements by bringing up evidence from a text or poem, and giving our opinions of the context. The class in interested in progress, we share ideas to get different outlooks on what we are studying. Peace is very goal oriented, and that is what we want to achieve as a community, and we have come to realize that various ideas results in progress, leading us to a final conclusion.