Peace Poetry: What does it mean? How does it relate to war poetry? - Jim

Muriel Rukeyser stated in her book, The Life of Poetry, that peace should mean more than the lack of war; it should be something fierce and positive. Rukeyser believed that peace, in contemporary definitions, wasn’t ideal, and that people should push for a better future. Poets are responsible for the task of spreading ideas to people, providing them with their perspectives through their poetry. Since poetry has the potential to have a great effect on society, it should be used as a medium to spread ideas about peace and prosperity thereby changing the way people view the word “peace.”

Peace poetry does exactly this. It delivers messages of idealism and utopianism, and seeks to present just and peaceful societies within its context. However, the scope of peace poetry is wide, and seems too idealistic to be able to relate directly to its readers. Since it is the poets’ job to present their perspectives so that other people can relate to them, in order for peace poetry to be effective it must envision something attainable and realistic. In the article, “Poems for Peace,” Philip Metres speaks of peace in American society as meaning a “preparation of war.” Unfortunately, that is true to some extent. People generally view “peace” as meaning merely a lack of violence. This can be seen in the war poem, “2,000 Pounds,” where in the aftermath of a tragic event, the only peace was that of dying souls and people whispering to their beloveds. In the midst of such tragedy and violence, it is reasonable to think that most people would consider peace to simply mean a lack of war.

Denise Levertov, an anti-war poet, argued in her article, “Poetry and Peace: Some Broader Dimensions,” that the definition of peace as something positive instead of just an interim between wars was something which was almost unperceivable in modern society. By saying this she is acknowledging that the definition of peace does not hold up to Rukeyser’s dreams. However, Levertov proposed that peace poetry at this point should not jump into visions of prosperity and advancement, since that would be far too outlandish for society to fully grasp. Instead, peace poets should focus on writing about the preparation for peace, thereby easing society into the belief that peace should mean something more than a lack of war.

Peace poems have the potential to advocate peace even in the midst of war. Muriel Rukeyser’s “Poem,” William Stafford’s “Peace Walk,” and Denise Levertov’s “Making Peace” all talk about seeking to better oneself even in the midst of violence and turmoil. These peace poems reference words and phrases like “love,” “reach beyond ourselves,” and “energy field more intense than war” to convey the feeling that the poets believed that they could overcome the obstacles of conflict through peace and end up in a more positive situation.

The difference between peace poetry and war poetry is that peace poetry isn’t as indirect about its goals like war poetry is. Peace poetry isn’t afraid to mention the presence of conflict, and then depicts peace through images of happiness and progress. War poetry wants to affect the reader through imagery and emotions in order to convey the idea of anti-war. Peace poetry seeks to tell the reader that peace should mean something positive, and has the potential to overcome war.